JoaquinPhoenix.com - The place for Joaquin Phoenix fans
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Mystaria  
#1 Posted : Thursday, December 2, 2021 9:50:02 AM(UTC)
Mystaria
Rank: Master of Joaquin

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/21/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,400
Woman
United States
Location: Joaquinland;)

Thanks: 622 times
Was thanked: 516 time(s) in 451 post(s)
thanks 1 user thanked Mystaria for this useful post.
calliope on 12/2/2021(UTC)
Sponsor
Good Girls Fake It
Offline calliope  
#2 Posted : Thursday, December 2, 2021 1:33:38 PM(UTC)
calliope
Rank: Joaquin Enthusiast

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/18/2020(UTC)
Posts: 134

Thanks: 184 times
Was thanked: 61 time(s) in 55 post(s)
I have mixed feelings on large age gaps like this where the male is older. I can understand the concern, but it’s at the point where the man is labeled a “predator” or a “pervert”.

My niece currently has a boyfriend with a similar age gap as Casey/Caylee, but she’s in her early thirties. So far it’s working out ok for her. A lot of young woman prefer older men. Generally speaking, there are a substantial amount of guys in their late teens to twenties who don’t make the best boyfriends either.
I’m not a fan of Casey, but in this instance I think there’s been a lot of pearl-clutching by the same people ( mostly women) who attack Florence Pugh’s relationship as well.

As we all know,Joaquin was dating a 19-20 year old several years ago and the press ran wild with it.

Edited by user Thursday, December 2, 2021 2:47:55 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.123 seconds.